Re: M-TH: Erratum

[Hugh Rodwell]

>Er, perhaps I should point out it's the sentiment I find so pleasing, not
>necessarily the sanguine 'new economy' exceptionalism implicit there-in.
>Human work (as opposed to the inhuman work that rules the roost today) will
>ever be part of the world, and no-one should be denied their whack.  Being
>'overplaced' unto social irrelevance and private impotence is itself the
>thing that is obscene - 'guaranteeing the survival' of those we first throw
>away is a rather incoherent and (I'd've thought) unchristian way to go about
>doing the lord's work ...
>
>Rob


There you go. A huge material difference in perspective and policy with
even the most radical of the cassocked crew.

Cheers,

Hugh




     --- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---