Jim heartfield
Sat, 11 Mar 2000 02:29:47 -0800
Livingstone's campaign is pointedly anti-political. He has already said that 'he's not running as a socialist', and appeals instead to a 'kick the bums out mood', telling the NME awards "I prefer to be here having a good laugh rather than sitting in the House of Commons listening to that lot drone on." Livingstone is more Ross Perot than George Lansbury. In message <007f01bf89f9$0f4f9900$08fe869f@oemcomputer>, George Pennefather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >Three cheers for Hugh. What would we all do without him. > > >Hugh: It's not a static question. It's a question of a movement being built >around Livingstone's candidacy that might well be able to use a few >fundamental democratic, anti-bourgeois slogans to gather behind it all the >popular disaffection and hatred for New Labour's neo-liberal Tory policies >that exists in London. > >Warm regards >George Pennefather > >Be free to check out our Communist Think-Tank web site at >http://homepage.eircom.net/~beprepared/ > >Be free to subscribe to our Communist Think-Tank mailing community by >simply placing subscribe in the body of the message at the following address: >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Hugh: It's not a static question. It's a question of a movement being built >around Livingstone's candidacy that might well be able to use a few >fundamental democratic, anti-bourgeois slogans to gather behind it all the >popular disaffection and hatred for New Labour's neo-liberal Tory policies >that exists in London. The outcome in terms of votes cast and local >government measures will be less interesting than the shift produced in the >balance of forces between a radicalizing mass movement and all the various >shades of manipulative self-seekers in the Labour party machine and >Livingstone's immediate entourage. Anyone seriously interested in building >a solid revolutionary working-class party and solid revolutionary >working-class movements will want to get stuck in here. Anyone not seeing >this as a heaven-sent opportunity will earn themselves the title of >armchair pedants at worst or sponsors of individual anarchistic heroics at >best. > >It's also obvious from the red-baiting that's getting started now, and the >horror felt by Livingstone himself at being taken seriously when he pays >lip-service to socialism, that the intervention of revolutionary Marxists >in this campaign will not be easy. In other words, a real and exciting >challenge lies ahead. > >Cheers, > >Hugh > > > > > > --- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- > > > > > --- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- Jim heartfield --- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---