******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ******************** #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. *****************************************************************
Postol's "analysis" is so confusing to me that I have to ask if this is really the report he is critiquing https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/04/11/world/middleeast/document-Syria-Chemical-Weapons-Report-White-House.html Is there another report I can't find? His argument, and the one picked up the most by others it seems and he expands on in an addendum, is that the "sarin canister" in the crater shows clear evidence it was not dropped from a plane in a bomb but instead had an explosive laid up against it on the street. The problem is, I can't find anywhere in the report that claims the tube in the crater was the "sarin canister". Am I missing something or is Postol really arguing against himself? -- Tristan Sloughter "I am not a crackpot" - Abe Simpson t...@crashfast.com _________________________________________________________ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
