Stand by Syria!

A debate on the situation in Syria at a recent New Worker public meeting in 
London was addressed by Professor Kamal Majid, a communist, well-known 
commentator in the Arab media, and vice-president of the Stop the War 
Coalition, and New Communist Party general secretary Andy Brooks, also 
something of an expert on the Arab world.

It was an opportunity to analyse in detail the complex situation in Syria, and 
the recent upheavals across the Arab world, from a Marxism-Leninist perspective.

Professor Majid began by declaring that “the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda 
are now spreading terror and sectarian division across Syria, as part of the 
imperialist plan to replace the Syrian government with a puppet state, à la 
Libya, which will do the bidding of the Americans and Zionists”.

He explained that after the final collapse of the Ottoman Empire in 1919, “most 
of the Arab countries were ruled by ruthless dictators with close links with 
Istanbul, which remained attached to imperialism. 

“But the exception to this rule was Hafez al-Assad, who was not with the 
imperialists and had a long history of resisting imperialism” (our emphasis). 

He pointed out that although the philosophy of the ruling Arab Socialist 
Renaissance Party (generally known as the Ba’ath Party) is secular, “Syria’s 
Western enemies highlight the fact that the Assad family belongs to the Alawite 
Shia sect, in order to set them against the Syrian people”. 

(The BBC variously describes the Alawite Shias as a “sect” or “clan” – NW).

Majid said this deception reflected “the current United States strategy of 
setting Sunni and Shia muslims against one another, first in Iraq after the 
failure of its occupation plan, and later across the Middle East. 

“In Gaza,” he said, “the US is against Hamas, but elsewhere it uses the Sunni 
Muslim Brotherhood, recently against Libya and also against Syria, Hezbollah in 
Lebanon, and Iran”.

“Huge weapons shipments have been sent into Syria from France, paid for by 
Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, and US special forces have been operating on 
the ground in Syria for many months. The UN’s response has been to send Kofi 
Annan UN in order to pacify both sides in the conflict. 

“This is a perfect situation for the United States, with local people paying 
the price in blood and suffering”.

“Yugoslavia,” he continued, “was divided with the help of Al Qaeda - then a US 
ally - which was very active in Bosnia.” He predicted that “the involvement of 
Al Qaeda in Syria and elsewhere in the Arab world will continue, even if the US 
and European imperialist role ends”.

Looking at the social structure of Syria, Majid said “class divisions are much 
smaller than elsewhere in the Arab world, but most Syrians are very poor. 

“The country is surrounded by powerful enemies including Turkey and Israel, and 
this which has led to a high level of unity behind the government, far more 
than in Libya. In comparison, the anti-Assad opposition is sharply divided”.

He concluded with a stirring call to support Syria “Not because the Ba’athists 
are being battered by imperialism, but because their defeat will pave the way 
for a pro-Western and pro-US regime, and constitute a huge setback for the Arab 
and Palestinian causes”.

Andy Brooks began by pointing out that “imperialism can never solve the 
problems of the Arabs, or indeed any other people in the world and it never 
claims to do so. It flies the false flag of “human rights” to justify 
neo-colonialist aggression and it is doing in Syria what it has already done in 
Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan, hopes to do in Iran if it gets half the chance”.

Andy Brooks reported on the stand taken by the major trends within Syria’s 
communist movements in support of genuine reform but opposed to all attempts to 
tear up the new constitution. Both broadly agreed on the need to build 
solidarity with Syria’s progressive and democratic forces that have closed 
ranks around the Arab Socialist Renaissance Party (Baath) to end the violence 
and defend the gains of the Syrian national revolution.

Turning to the political situation, he said “Syria has a strong communist 
movement which is taking part in the current constitutional reforms. Syria was 
first Arab country to include communists in government, and was followed later 
by Sudan and Iraq. 

“All three communist parties in Syria all support the Assad government and 
defend the secular nature of the regime, and two belonging to the ruling 
National Progressive Front, established by Hafez al-Assad in 1972 as an 
alliance of eleven parties. 

“All its members support the socialist and Arab nationalist orientation of the 
government and accept the ‘leading role in society’ of the Ba’ath Party”.

Describing the Ba’ath Party as “a national bourgeois party,” Andy said “it is 
the only party in the Middle East to call for the unity of all Arabs, and, in 
common with the region’s communist parties, calls for Arab control of all the 
region’s oil resources. 

“The party was originally founded in Syria but its influence has extended 
across the Arab world. At various times there have been branches in Kuwait, 
Saudi Arabia, the Yemen, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya and Sudan. In Saudi wing 
its base was in the Shia community, with a strong stance against the Saudi 
royal family and American imperialism. 

“The ideology of Ba'athism promotes Arab nationalism, pan-Arabism, Arab 
socialism, secularism and anti-imperialism, and it currently sees its national 
interests being preserved by an alliance with Russia”. 

“The Ba’ath has repeatedly been the victim of the full force of US imperialist 
power, notably in Iraq – which along with Libya was the only Arab country to 
nationalise the oil industry - and now in Syria”.

Andy recalled that “Syria’s intervention on Lebanon in 1976 saved the 
progressive forces there from a catastrophic defeat, and paved the way for a 
new constitution which ended the French-imposed political system based on the 
dominance of the Christian community. 

“This was a major setback for the US and its European imperialist allies (and 
Israel???), which contributed to their hatred of the Ba’ath Party and the Assad 
leadership”.

Looking at the socio-economic system in Syria, Andy said “under the Ba’ath 
Party’s rule the Syrian peasantry has benefitted hugely from land reforms, a 
good education system, and careers in the army, medicine, engineering and 
administration. 

“Syria,” he added, “is the only country in the Middle East with a welfare state 
apart from Libya, which unlike Syria enjoyed enormous oil wealth”.

Turning to the wider region, Andy recalled that “Dick Cheney’s original plan 
for the Middle East was to divide the region into cantons and build 19 US bases 
in Iraq, enabling US control of 95% of the world’s known oil reserves. But this 
failed due to the strength of the Iraqi resistance, and Washington turned to 
Turkey and Arab princes.

“Turkey is a key NATO member, the only Middle Eastern country to maintain good 
relations with Israel, and has a long wished to become a regional power, partly 
a legacy of the Ottoman Empire. 

“Both Britain and the US have a long-standing special relationship with Turkey 
dating from the Cold War, and this became even more important for US 
imperialism after the fall of the Shah or Iran.

“Under its current AKP government Turkey is a strong supporter of the Muslim 
Brotherhood in Egypt, Palestine, Syria and elsewhere. Hence its interests at 
this moment coincide with those of US.

He added that “US officials never refer to ‘Arab’ countries, only to 
nationalities and religious groups, reflecting their strategy setting one group 
against another in the Arab would”.

He also recalled that “in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq workers, including several 
million of Palestinians and Egyptians, were the highest paid in the Arab world. 
Iraq led the Arab world in higher education and tens of thousands from across 
the region studied engineering, medicine, science and social science there”.

Looking at the basis of the NCP’s anti-imperialist position in relation to the 
Arab world, Andy said “our attitude to Iraq, Iran, Libya, Syria and Sudan is 
based on the view that at this time US imperialism is the main enemy of the 
world’s people, and any country which comes into contradiction with US 
imperialism should be supported. This is not a long-term political principle 
but a strategic position.

“Thus, although the Islamic regime in Iran is based on Shia fundamentalism, on 
the basis of its national interests it sees the US as the country’s greatest 
enemy and calls it ‘the great Satan’, while it describes Russia as ‘the little 
Satan’. 

Giving historical examples of this position, Andy pointed to the defence of 
Ethiopia when it was invaded by Mussolini’s Italy in 1935 by the Soviet Union 
and the Comintern, “despite the fact that Ethiopia under Haile Selassie was a 
backward, slave-owning feudal monarchy”. 

“Similarly, Cuba under Fidel Castro sided against with Argentina in the 
Falklands War – along with most of the Latin American countries - despite the 
fact that the ruling generals there were crushing the communists and the left. 

He concluded by saying that “it is impossible to be a Marxist-Leninist without 
understanding this fundamental principle in the era of imperialism”.

This detailed Marxist-Leninist analysis of the situation on Syria provides a 
strong basis for establishing the priorities of international solidarity with 
Syria at a time when many in the political left and centre, who nine years ago 
were united against the plan to invade Iraq, have been duped by the Tsunami of 
sophisticated Western ‘human rights’ propaganda, first in Libya and now in 
Syria.

While the peace and solidarity movement in Britain is at a relatively low ebb 
compared to 2003, and despite the recent tragic defeats suffered by small and 
defenceless countries at the hands of imperialism, it is still vitally 
important  to uphold that political solidarity. 

Today the people of Syria, like the people of Libya in 2011, are paying in 
blood and lives for the agression of imperialism and its opportunist allies.


_______________________________________________
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
Marxist-Leninist-List@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list

Reply via email to