"Also since SCCM service is delayed start, it takes a looooong time for the remote session to become available after a reboot. That really hamstrings certain support workflows."
Would simply changing the startup to Automatic for the Configuration Manager Remote Control service using Group Policy fix this? On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Miller, Todd <todd-mil...@uiowa.edu> wrote: > Better support for multiple monitors would be a nice addition. Frankly, I > am just glad to have the tool back after it was abandoned (almost) entirely > in SCCM 2007. The support staff’s biggest complaint is lack of useable > support for multiple monitors. Also since SCCM service is delayed start, > it takes a looooong time for the remote session to become available after a > reboot. That really hamstrings certain support workflows. > > > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcum, John > *Sent:* Thursday, December 01, 2016 8:22 AM > *To:* 'mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com' <mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com> > *Subject:* RE: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it > actually worked? > > > > The main thing I want them to add is support for remote machines. You > could ask for Mac support too assuming you are managing your Mac’s with > SCCM. > > > And yes Niall, it should be user voice I screwed up. > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] *On Behalf Of *Isaac > Holmes > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:43 PM > *To:* mdtosd@lists.myitforum.com > *Cc:* ms...@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: [MDT-OSD] Would you use ConfigMgr Remote Control if it > actually worked? > > > > *[External Email]* > > I would love to use it, but we would still have to buy another product to > be able to remotely support and assist on Mac machines. > > Isaac Holmes > IT Engineering Specialist > > University of Notre Dame > 320 IT Center > Notre Dame, IN 46556 > > (574) 631-3254 > > > > On Nov 29, 2016 8:08 PM, "Niall Brady" <any...@gmail.com> wrote: > > shouldn't this be a uservoice instead john ? > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Marcum, John <jmar...@bradley.com> wrote: > > How many of you would like to use ConfigMgr remote control however it’s > limited functionality prevents you from doing so? Worse still is that you > are likely paying for some other remote control solution because remote > control in ConfigMgr just doesn’t meet your needs. If you agree and you’d > like to see improvements made in the current remote control offering in > ConfigMgr please vote up my item on connect. > > > > https://connect.microsoft.com/ConfigurationManagervnext/ > feedbackdetail/view/3113536/make-configmgr-remote-control-more-useful > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be > protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have > received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to > this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by > the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is > intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is > addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, > and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the > intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this > communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or > destroy all copies of the original message and attachments thereto. Email > sent to or from UI Health Care may be retained as required by law or > regulation. Thank you. > ------------------------------ >
