Re: [utah-glx-dev] Re: [Mesa-dev] 3Dnow asm broken on the K6-III?

[justin]

>Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 15:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Ralph Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Sender: giles@localhost
>To: Holger Waechtler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cc: justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mesa3d developer mailing list 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [utah-glx-dev] Re: [Mesa-dev] 3Dnow asm broken on the K6-III?
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Mailman-Version: 1.1
>List-Id: <utah-glx-dev.lists.sourceforge.net>
>X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Holger Waechtler wrote:
>> I thought about a built in version check in the configure script, if gas
>> might be buggy, but decided against it, since H.J. Lu couldn't tell me,
>> when this was fixed (his only comment was 'They are soooo old ...'), and a
>> real test program would be longer then some lines.
>
>> Beside this Mesa can be still built on the old Makefile way, where this
>> test would be skipped. (Ok, you can include such tests in Makefiles too,
>> but it's a bit more complicated). And as far I know the glx people
>> have their own build system.
>
>Utah does indeed have its own build system, but it's autoconf-based, so
>if you want to write a detection check, I'd be happy to include it. We
>already cribbed the isa-extension support tests from you. :)
> 
>> I believe, the best would be a notice or warning in the README file, the
>> release notes or on the Download page.
>
>Debian 2.2 (currently in freeze) is using binutils 2.9.5.0.31, so there
>are definitely new versions available, though the url given puts the
>original source in a 'beta' directory. Given the age of the 2.9.1 series,
>the the conservative policies of Debian, I'd expect any new distribution
>to ship 2.9.5.
>

Not exactly -- the latest Slackware is still at 2.9.1.0.25.  That still should
be OK -- see my other mail pinning down the exact version it was fixed.

I don't know the behavior of the average glx developer, but personally, if I 
were still running Linux, I would never think of updating binutils unless the 
latest and greatest kernel required it.

That being the case, the problem might go away after 2.4 hits ;-)

>The latest version at ftp://ftp.varesearch.com/pub/support/hjl/binutils/
>is 2.9.5.0.34, dated 2000 April 4. The release notes still call it a beta, 
>but nearing public release.
>
> -ralph
>
>P.S. I note we haven't heard an 'upgrading binutils fixed this for me'
>from the original reporters. I'll prod them.

You're right, but then again who would suspect binutils might be a possible 
cause of the problem?
Hopefully we could get a listing of the binutils versions from those who have 
problems, and then go from there.

Justin A. Kolodziej
This .signature intentionally left blank



_______________________________________________
Mesa-dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.mesa3d.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev