Re: david nolan's patches

[David Nolan]

--On Monday, June 07, 2004 1:32 PM -0700 Jim Trocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, David Nolan wrote:
(In fact, I may  have posted it to the list, but I can't recall
right now.  Time for some > email archeology.)
ahh, i apologize for my confusion. clearly my recollection was faulty,
and you now corrected it. thanks.
as far as maintaining the code in cvs with the intention of allowing
better cooperation amongst ourselves, i think it's a good idea. i don't
know if the sourceforge thing is what would be best. it does have some
advantages, such as the bug tracking functionality, mon is already
a registered project there and all (i haven't looked at that thing in
forever), but cvs tends to aggravate me. i guess i've been living with it
long enough to just accept it if that's all that sourceforge offers. i'd
prefer giving subversion a try.

Since I use CVS everyday for all the project I work on, CVS would be fine 
with me.  If you prefer another option, I'm sure we can work it out.

Ultimately, I'll be continuing to maintain the CMU custom version in our 
CVS tree, and importing changes from your version.  So I'll have to deal 
with two different repositories anyway.

Sourceforge & CVS would seem to be the easiest path, and as Scott points 
out it gives us some other features as well.  If you don't have any 
strenuous objections, why don't we go ahead and start using sourceforge? 
Upload the current stable version and the devel version, give me access, 
and I'll work on integrating my changes.  (My sourceforge userid is vitroth)

-David
David Nolan                    <*>                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
curses: May you be forced to grep the termcap of an unclean yacc while
     a herd of rogue emacs fsck your troff and vgrind your pathalias!
_______________________________________________
mon mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon