Re: MD Reality and observation

[Robert Stillwell]

Hey David,

Thanks for your help.  I'm going to (re?)read some of the posts you
mentioned.  I don't think you are lazy.  If you are willing to help me out,
but feel that you are rehashing old stuff, I owe it to you to go back on my
own.  You have no idea of what I have or have not digested.  I just hope
that if I come back with more questions, that you'll still be there to
answer.

A one-sentence answer to one question would help a lot in the meantime.

I looked up "phenomenal" online on WWWebster and got "synonym: material".
Good to see SO materialism is still doing so well .... laughing!

But I also got a more useful definition:

relating to or being a phenomenon: as a : known through the senses rather
than through thought or intuition b : concerned with phenomena rather than
with hypotheses

By saying DQ is non-phenomenal, are you only saying DQ can't be conceived
(understood)? Or are you also saying also saying that DQ can't be perceived
(observed) directly?

If you go with the latter, I merely misunderstood you and it will save me a
lot of re-reading!



MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]