Re: question urgent [anova vs. manova -the mod]

[morphmet]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: question urgent [anova vs. manova -the mod]
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:05:27 GMT
From: Dennis E. Slice <dsl...@morphometrics.org>
To: morphmet@morphometrics.org
References: <4b225cb2.4010...@morphometrics.org>

I think you will find that folks simply use the two interchangeably. It
is rather difficult to contrive a univariate anova in GM. Group
differences on a PC come to mind. Centroid size differences, another.
Otherwise, almost all is multivariate.

-ds

morphmet wrote:

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:     question urgent
Date:     Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:54:12 -0800 (PST)
From:     Luis Fernando García Hernández <crypto_luis...@yahoo.com>
To:     morphmet_modera...@morphometrics.org



Dear fellows,

I´m recently introducing on morphometry field and I´d like to know why
the ANOVA is used in procruster analysis while manova is used on the
thin splate analysis!

I´d thank your fast answer!

Thanks,

Luis


------------------------------------------------------------------------

¡Obtén la mejor experiencia en la web!
Descarga gratis el nuevo Internet Explorer 8
http://downloads.yahoo.com/ieak8/?l=e1

--
Dennis E. Slice
Associate Professor
Dept. of Scientific Computing
Florida State University
Dirac Science Library
Tallahassee, FL 32306-4120
        -
Guest Professor
Department of Anthropology
University of Vienna
        -
Software worth having/learning/using...
 Linux (Operating System: Ubuntu, CentOS, openSUSE, etc.)
 OpenOffice (Office Suite: http://www.openoffice.org/)
 R package (Stats/Graphics environment: http://www.r-project.org/)
 Eclipse (Java/C++/etc IDE: http://www.eclipse.org/)
========================================================



--
Replies will be sent to the list.
For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org