Hello Naoki,
Sunday, October 08, 2000, 4:24:19 AM, you wrote:
Roel>> I just tried on the version without extensions. I don't understand
Roel>> the extra benefit of the nspsytune. Please explain to me what flaw needed
Roel>> fixing in the older lame's and how you did it? I still find the sound
Roel>> not good, and the file only gets needlessly bigger.
NS> Perhaps you are hoping joint stereo to be improved, but --nspsytune
NS> doesn't improve anything with joint stereo.
NS> --nspsytune is intended to improve result of vbrtest.wav and square
NS> wave with VBR. You can obtain vbrtest.wav from website of lame. And,
NS> --nspsytune improves CBR quality at bitrate like 128kbps. Perhaps you
NS> can easily notice difference with result of appluad.wav.
thanks for the clarification. now I understand what nspsytune tries
to achieve.
I just asumed that it had something to do with JS because you told
that it wouldn't work with the RH extensions.
I guess the JS problem will be tackled at another time :)
--
Best regards,
Roel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
