On Tuesday 09 May 2017 10:41:00 Fred van Stappen wrote: > Hello. > > > If I may give my HO, I see more future for libraries than for executables > for Pascal. > > > So I hope that mselang will take (much more) care for the size and speed of > libraries than fpc does. > MSElang uses LLVM to produce the binaries so I assume if you get good results with Clang you will get good results with MSElang too. > > It is sad that still a fpc library with same code is 5 times bigger than a > fpc executable ( and montain times bigger than same C code compiled with > gcc or clang). > Do you know why? > > I ask it regularly to fpc forum but (still same answer for more than 15 > years now !) ---> "It is on the todo list". > > > fpc libraries can be compiled for Java-native-libraries too. > > > I have to confess also that my plan are to use Pascal only for creating > libraries (and Java for the rest). > Why? Doesn't this make debugging much more difficult?
Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
