On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Martin Schreiber <mse00...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 May 2017 15:26:24 Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote:
>> It is not about if these languages are better, but if they are easy to
>> do the work.
> Thats the reason why I proposed the additional and possibly redundant "class".
> You are against the "class" which eliminates the explicit "^" dereference and
> you are against the "^" which eliminates the uncertainty of value/reference
> object item access with the same notation. :-)

Because I thought that was possible to have just one notation using
"object".  :)
Let's think more about it...

Marcos Douglas

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
mseide-msegui-talk mailing list

Reply via email to