Hallo Martin,

Du schriebst am Tue, 9 May 2017 07:49:01 +0200:

...
> > > >> 2. In this case:
> > > >>  obj2: ^objty; //on heap
> > > >>
> > > >> Is it possible to remove the "^"?
> > > >> obj2.f1:= 123;  
> > > >
> > > > No, obj2 is a pointer.
> > > >  
> > > >> I think this distinction exists because "class" exists, right?  
> >
> > How does that behave in case of _nested objects_, possibly with
> > identically named fields, which might even be of different types? Is
> > that manageable, or will the construct break down, at least on
> > "pathological" casses? 
> Example?

Sorry, no example, not yet at least. I'm much too busy with many other
things right now, things not at all computer or programming related...
And this was just a conjecture anyway.

-- 
-- 
(Weitergabe von Adressdaten, Telefonnummern u.ä. ohne Zustimmung
nicht gestattet, ebenso Zusendung von Werbung oder ähnlichem)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, S. Schicktanz
-----------------------------------------------------------



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
mseide-msegui-talk mailing list
mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk

Reply via email to