Hello. I am not sure about the terminology but let'say:
- Staticaly Linking = use libX11.so = store some data in ELF, more safe... - Dynamicaly Linking = use libX11.so.6 = more freedom, can use dynlib.... That said, both linkings have advantages. And I am not sure for libX11 that Staticaly Linking is the one I would choose. So, IMHO and, please, without opening any war, I would vote in a utopic world for a compiler that gives me the choice. Or to link libX11 in my program Staticaly or Dynamicaly. But, yes, I agree, it is twice the work to develop the package (and twice problems to debug it). But do not worry, this will never append for fpc. Fre;D -- View this message in context: http://mseide-msegui-talk.13964.n8.nabble.com/MSEide-MSEgui-talk-MSE-and-XLib-tp5p28.html Sent from the mseide-msegui-talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
