Adding zeros is an advantage as then you don't need to calculate their
multiplication, as 0 x coefficient = 0
The filter order will be the same with zeros or repeated samples.
Tom
On 7/24/2018 4:37 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Hello Nigel
could you please say a word more to what you mean by "2x", "3x"?
Also I am again not sure why in this case, adding zeros is an
advantage. I had expected to just copy the samples to have less work
to do in filtering. I tested such things in MATLAB and found that
feeding zeros needs more filter TAPs to come to the same result.
Rolf
*Gesendet:* Montag, 23. Juli 2018 um 18:25 Uhr
*Von:* "Nigel Redmon" <[email protected]>
*An:* [email protected]
*Betreff:* Re: [music-dsp] resampling
Some articles on my website:
http://www.earlevel.com/main/category/digital-audio/sample-rate-conversion/,
especially the 2010 articles, but the Amp Sim article might be a
helpful overview.
48k -> 8k: Filter with a lowpass with cutoff below 4k; keep 1 sample,
throw away 5, repeat.
8k -> 48k: Use 1 sample, follow it with 5 new samples of 0 value,
repeat; filter with a lowpass filter with cutoff below 4k.
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
Virus-free. www.avg.com
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
_______________________________________________
dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
_______________________________________________
dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
