And now:Ish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


This message is forwarded to you as a service of Zapatistas Online.
Comments and volunteers are welcome.  Write [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Date:          Thu, 10 Jun 1999 20:33:13 -0400
From:          Paul Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
********************************************



STRATFOR Global Intelligence Update   6/10/99


U.S. Proposes Intervention Forces for Latin American Crises


Summary:

During a meeting of the Organization of American States (OAS) the
U.S. proposed the creation of a multinational force to guarantee
the security of the Western Hemisphere.  At the same time, the
U.S. is reportedly pushing a plan to support Colombia's neighbors
with aircraft and intelligence in their efforts to contain
Colombian guerrillas.  With its OAS proposal in the long term and
its Colombia plan in the short term, the U.S. appears eager to
become more actively involved in resolving Latin America's long
running conflicts.  This promises at best a mixed blessing for
U.S. businesses currently operating in Colombia and throughout
the region, as greater U.S. involvement will draw greater
reaction from the region's rebels.

Analysis:

A report in the June 9 edition of the Colombian newspaper El
Tiempo described a U.S. proposal to create a multinational
intervention force for Latin America.  The proposal, which was
presented at a meeting of the General Assembly of the
Organization of American States (OAS), calls for a "group of
friendly countries," who are closely linked politically or
economically, to intervene in internal conflicts threatening
democracy in Latin American countries.

Although Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, and
Venezuela opposed the U.S. proposal, the U.S. representative to
the OAS, Victor Marrero, said the proposal was not dead.  "We
never hoped that the proposal would be approved at this session,
we just wanted to put the matter on the table for discussion.
But this topic is not dead," Marrero said.  Objections to the
proposal centered on who would determine if a crisis was serious
enough to warrant intervention, as well as the form and degree of
intervention necessary.

In a potentially related report, the June 7 edition of the
Colombian newspaper "El Espectador" reported details of what it
claimed is a U.S. plan to block the spread of Colombian guerrilla
activity to neighboring countries.  According to the report,
which cited U.S. State Department sources, the U.S. is planning
to support border forces in Brazil, Ecuador, Panama, Peru, and
Venezuela with aircraft and intelligence to help contain the
Colombian rebels.  At the same time, the U.S. State Department
would reportedly label the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de
Colombia (FARC) and the Ejercito de Liberacion Nacional (ELN)
"narco-guerrillas," declaring them responsible for participating
in the narcotics industry in Colombia.  The alleged plan would
also involve extradition requests aimed at linking the insurgency
more closely with the drug trade.  In more concretely linking the
guerrillas with the narcotics trade, the El Tiempo claims that
the State Department hopes to both reduce criticism from the U.S.
Congress and to build regional support for a multinational force.

The U.S. State Department has long woven a tortuous argument
that, while the U.S. is not and will not become involved in
battling Colombia's guerrillas, it is actively participating in
the war on drugs.  And since Colombia's guerrillas are
participating in narcotics production and trafficking, then...
and the rest occurs in the Colombian jungle.  In actively touting
a plan for multinational intervention against "threats to
democracy" in Latin America; in planning to actively assist
Colombia's neighbors in battling incursions by Colombian
guerrillas; and in linking the FARC and ELN more directly to the
drug trade, the U.S. appears to be moving beyond its doublespeak.
While still doing so in a roundabout manner, the U.S. appears to
be deepening its commitment to Colombian counterinsurgency (COIN)
operations.

This increased U.S. involvement, still short of a full and public
commitment to Colombia's war on the FARC and ELN, may bring
repercussions against U.S. businesses and counter-narcotics
forces in the region.  U.S. military personnel and particularly
Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) personnel have been targets of
guerrillas and drug lords alike since the 1980s.  Still,
Colombia's guerrillas have attempted to avoid killing too many
Americans or directly attacking U.S. forces in the region, as the
threat of full scale U.S. retaliation has outweighed the
political benefits to be gained from such attacks.  However, a
more active U.S. role in COIN in the region may change that
equation, increasing the risks to U.S. government and military
personnel -- and possibly to U.S. businessmen and tourists -- in
Latin America.  That, in turn, could demand a still deeper U.S.
involvement in Colombian COIN, and away slides the U.S. down a
slippery slope.

Copyright 1999 STRATFOR   http://www.stratfor.com/





NUEVO AMANECER PRESS-PRENSA NUEVO AMANECER-N.A.P.
To know us visit our web page in Spanish in Mexico at:
http://www.nap.cuhm.mx/nap0.htm
E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
General Director: Roger Maldonado 
A Press in support of the work in defense of Human Rights
***********************************************************


Reprinted under the fair use http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
doctrine of international copyright law.
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
          Tsonkwadiyonrat (We are ONE Spirit)
                     Unenh onhwa' Awayaton
                  http://www.tdi.net/ishgooda/       
           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
                             

Reply via email to