On 6 April 2010 17:22, Lewis Adam-VNQM87 <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. Is the error message correct if we want to support the > latest SNMP standards?
RowStatus is certainly the standard mechanism for controlling the creation/deletion of rows in SNMP tables. But I'm not sure I'd describe it as an _error_ for a table to not have a RowStatus column. It's certainly worth a warning, but it's not actually an error. > 2. If we know a table has a fixed number of entries, is there a syntax we > can use to specify that rows cannot be created? Define the column objects as "read-only" or "read-write". If the columns are not "read-create", then the validator should not attempt to require a RowStatus column. (And if it does, then it's broken IMO!) Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
