Laine Stump
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:59:41 -0700
On 10/23/2009 12:32 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:34:54AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > >> A couple of questions on this topic: >> >> 1) I didn't add anything to ncftool that exercises this new >> functionality. Do you see any use to this? (The information is given >> implicitly by "list"). >> > It could be useful to include it in the list output, eg > instead of > > ncftool> list --all > eth0 > eth1 > lo > ppp0 > > have > > ncftool> list --all > eth0 UP > eth1 UP > lo UP > ppp0 DOWN > > or some less crude formatting >
Okay, I'll take a whack at that momentarily. I'm also adding in reporting of mac address, which will hopefully work as easily as it seems to be getting written... > >> 2) Would it be useful to also add this information to the xml of >> ncf_if_xml_state()? If so, any suggestions on what it should look like? >> > I don't think it is relevant there, because whether an interface is up > or down is not configuration information. > ncf_if_xml_desc() is the config, ncf_if_xml_state() is only the information we got directly from the kernel. _______________________________________________ netcf-devel mailing list netcf-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/netcf-devel