On Jan 5, 2008 11:04 AM, Rob Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > lotu5 wrote: > > > On monday we'll have more writing for you about the project, but for > > now, I'd love any feedback you might have on the project... See for > > yourself at http://sharingissexy.org > > This cannot be described as "Open Source"
True. But not so relevant. It is much more interesting what this can inscribe then be described. > because commercial use is not > allowed. This breaks the Open Source Definition, Debian Free Software > Guidelines, Freedom Defined and the Free Software Definition. Using wrong argument. ...you are mixing Free Software and Open Source (in 2008 ;-)... > BY-SA rather than BY-NC-SA would solve this. ...with CC licencing schemes, which do overlap to a point but are separate. > Other than that, the project is absolutely brilliant. This could be Free > Culture's killer app. ;-) hm...what is with this hype of all of these antagonistic metaphors... Culture is acumulative it is bussiness that kill of alternatives... but I agree this could be a great tractor app :-) Now let's move on to content production and context construction ;-) > - Rob. Best wishes - Z _______________________________________________ Netporn Mailing List Netporn-l@listcultures.org list: http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/netporn-l_listcultures.org links: http://del.icio.us/netporn
