Kimberly De Vries
Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:24:08 -0800
Olia, let me see if I have this right: to sum up, it sucked before and in spite of seeming improvements, still sucks now. Ok, maybe that's how the majority of film and video authors have felt, though that's not been my impression. As viewers have we all always felt a little cheated? I haven't, but maybe I'm easily entertained. But forget that, becaue wiithout specific examples of works that were somehow spoiled or at least had their impacted reduced by the circumstances of presentation, I can't really judge whether I agree with your conclusions. Instead, I would very much like to hear about what would work better so that maybe we could try improving the situation. Even if things aren't as bad as you describe, we can always aim for improvement. Best, Kim On 1/27/07, olia lialina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > programs put together by festival curators were "ghettos", meaning the > curators' lack of respect for authors and films alike, Lately, several new > ways of screening short films and videos have come into existence: <...> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net