On 2025-03-02 11:38, Thomas Meyer wrote:
Hi Rik and autumnus, > > Sorry for my late reply, but thank you very much for your >
suggestions on this topic. Your calculations are very complicated I >
think. However, the type area is not the end of the story. >
Unfortunately, the line length remains the same with your > suggestions,
even if the font size is reduced. For good readability, > however, the
number of characters in the line should remain more or > less constant
and not increase. In any case, that's what I've read. > I have therefore
orientated myself on this: https:// >
wiki.contextgarden.net/Introduction/From_LaTeX_to_ConTeXt/KOMA- >
scrartcl_Type_Area > > It looks like this for me now: > >
\definebodyfontenvironment[12pt][interlinespace=15pt] >
\setupbodyfont[libertinus, 12pt] > >
\setuppagenumbering[location={footer,middle}, > alternative=doublesided]
> > \setupindenting[yes, small, next] > > %\enablemode[BCOR] % Set
binding correction value . >
\doifmodeelse{BCOR}{\def\bindingcorr{5mm}}{\def\bindingcorr{0pt}} > > %
Set visible page width. \newdimen\PageWidth >
\PageWidth=\dimexpr(\paperwidth-\bindingcorr) > > % Determine the paper
aspect ratio. \edef\Ratio{0.618} > %Golden Ratio > > % Set the textarea
height proportional to the width. > \newdimen\Height
\Height=41\baselineskip % constant > number of lines (41)
\newdimen\Width \Width=\dimexpr(\Ratio\Height) > > % Set the
margin/gutter widths to be equal on a full spread. % > \newdimen\Back
\Back=\dimexpr(((\PageWidth - \Width) / 2) + > \bindingcorr) > >
\enablemode[oneside] \newdimen\Back \doifmodeelse{oneside} >
{\Back=\dimexpr(((\PageWidth - \Width) / 2) + \bindingcorr)} >
{\Back=\dimexpr(((\PageWidth - \Width) / 3) + \bindingcorr)} > > > % Set
the top and bottom margins in a 1:2 ratio, ignoring headers. >
\edef\Top{\the\dimexpr((\paperheight - \Height) / 3 - 3\lineheight)} > >
% Redefine \Height to include header and footer space. >
\Height=\dimexpr(\Height + 8\lineheight) > > % Set up the page layout
using the calculated parameters. > \setuplayout[ backspace=\the\Back,
height=\the\Height, > width=\the\Width, header=2.5\lineheight, >
headerdistance=0.5\lineheight, footer=4.5\lineheight, >
footerdistance=0.5\lineheight, bottom=2\lineheight, >
bottomdistance=0.5\lineheight, margindistance=0.2\lineheight, >
topspace=\Top, grid=on, ] > > \starttext > > \showgrid > > \input knuth
> > \input tufte > > \input knuth > > \input tufte > > \showlayout[1,
pt, mm] > > \stoptext > > If I am wrong, please correct me. > >
Greetings Thomas
You are correct that these are two different approaches. The version I
showed calculates fixed top and side margins based on page size and
computes a type area of specific proportions after that. The user is
still responsible for determining an appropriate font size and leading,
and the line count follows from that. Your solution starts with a font
size, leading and line count, then computes text height, and lastly text
width, splitting the remaining space among the margins.
I think that there are a couple of problems with the code as shown.
* It conflates paper size and page size -- try adding
\setuppapersize[A5][A3] and you will see what I mean.
* I do not see where your solution adapts the width to the alphabet
width -- the referenced wiki page does; your version uses
\baselineskip an an indirect stand-in. (Also, the comment is now
misleading: Width is set proportionate to the determined height, not
height proportionate to a determined width.) As far as characters
per line, there are so many variables -- serif or sans, large or
small x-height, ... but for single column texts with book faces 50
to 70 characters width is typical, 40 to 50 for two-column setting.
You pick your authority and make your choice --
* Binding correction is a press-time issue. Page layout should not
deal with it -- it is handled during imposition after the paper
weight and binding methods are settled. Two different trades. (If
you need a quickie leaflet printed on standard untrimmed paper
perhaps you might want to look at it, but not beyond that.) As long
as you don't use BCOR mode, however, this is irrelevant to your
layout, and I would remove all references to it.
* Is this for a one-sided or two-sided document? You have
\setuppagenumbering configured for two-sided, but calculate margins
based on a mode suggesting a one-sided document.
Other than that, it does a fine job. Perhaps best practice calls for
\relax at the end of some of the \dimexprs, but that isn't necessary in
this case.
--
Rik
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] /
https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
