Am 21.03.2026 um 21:43 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context:
On 3/21/2026 8:24 PM, Jim wrote:
They currently are. But as Florent points out, a very small change fixes
this. But should the change be made?
you know the answer ... wolfgang has to check if it fits in the
interface (consistency, interference, etc)
The currrent entry is
\setupheadnumber [.1.] [.2.]
1 SECTION
2 [-+]NUMBER
and unless a count register is expected as argument dropping \number
shouldn't be a problem.
Another option is to add a + check (no need to check for -):
\permanent\tolerant\protected\def\setupheadnumber[#1]#*[#2]%
{\setstructurenumber{\thenamedheadlevel{#1}}{\ifhastoks{+}{#2}+\fi\number#2}}
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : [email protected] /
https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
