I don't equate "interesting" with "rare". Rare birds are often well-characterized - not least of all in weekly RBA posts. Interesting birds (self-defined) run a much larger gamut than that, and I can point to a lot of eBird checklists where there's no additional context whatsoever for such species.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Dominic Garcia-Hall <dominic.h...@gmail.com > wrote: > I find most people reporting to eBird are pretty good about including > context (location etc) in the comments field - not least because when it's > a genuine rarity eBird mandates some kind of commentary. > <snip> -- NYSbirds-L List Info: http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm ARCHIVES: 1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html 2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L 3) http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NYSB.html Please submit your observations to eBird: http://ebird.org/content/ebird/ --
