Adam Megacz
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:21:07 -0800
Andrew Deason <adea...@sinenomine.net> writes: >>> Yes, so then it's not terribly useful, unless you always use it at the >>> volume root.
Adam Megacz <a...@megacz.com> writes: >> I think you mean "below the volume root", not "at the volume root": >> >> [example omitted] Jeffrey Altman <jalt...@secure-endpoints.com> writes: > If you want to apply a different policy to a sub tree within the volume > user.foo, then you would split the volume at the directory where you > want the new policy to take effect and apply the policy to the new > volume. Then what you really meant was "it's not terribly useful to superusers unless you always use it at the volume root". I can agree with that statement. - a _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel