I was a bit unhappy with a response I received to questions about the proposed NJ Bill. It did not promote trust.
-- SS [email protected] wrote: ----- To: [email protected] From: Tony McCormick <[email protected]> Sent by: [email protected] Date: 06/20/2009 01:19AM cc: [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Re: [openhealth] Do we have a problem with CCHIT 2.0? I tend to agree, I think they have responded to the situation very well. Much better than expected. --Tony www.mi-squared. com Director, Linked IPAs, Houston fred trotter wrote: > I have not heard much about CCHIT since the townhall. I was very > pleased, they addressed all of the issues I was concerned with. > > Everyone I have spoken with seems satisfied. I am inclined to embrace > the new verification models whole hog. > > Can anyone think of a reason not to? Any lingering or new concerns? It > seems like a complete ( and mutual) victory but I just want to be sure > that we are not missing something. > > -ft > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
