On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Freddie Chopin <[email protected]> wrote: > This is really sad...
Thanks Freddie for your support :-) Yes this is sad, some guys sit on the code that was not perfect, complain that its not perfect, propose nothing concrete, don't accept any change except one line patches on what already in there. Guys I am not here to argue, but to have create a better tool, its time. This kind of argument, where you only say "things are bad", but give no alternative of real better solution, will lead us nowhere. I expected concrete solutions from you, not obvious generalities, you know best what is inside OpenOCD like noone else, also you know what and how to fix things.. You don't want to discuss the changes, you do not propose anything new, you didn't even read the solution that you are talking about, you mention the waste of time. Is this really a waste of time? :-( If we really don't get any consensus, it will be necessary to fork the project I guess and see who was right. Yet another similar tool will show up, when one could have become better, but that is your choice. If this will motivate you to fix the internals, and you need this drastic move, then its okay. Best regards, Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
