On Apr 6, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Doug Henry wrote: > I'm definitely not using any exclude options and I'm definitely doing -Ua. I > have installed a few packages using the --nodeps flag because they pick up > strange deps under openpkg 4 (see openpkg-import output below). This is > probably worthy of another bug report. Not sure if that gets stored somehow > and ends up confusing the update. I didn't use the nodeps option on anything > related to openssl, so I wouldn't think it should apply to my case. > > Executing(--clean): env -i /tools/lin64-testing/lib/openpkg/bash --norc > --noprofile --posix -e /tools/lin64-testing/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.58500 > + cd /tools/lin64-testing/RPM/TMP > error: Failed dependencies: > /usr/bin/addr2line is needed by openpkg-import-0-20070904 > /usr/bin/ar is needed by openpkg-import-0-20070904 > /usr/bin/as is needed by openpkg-import-0-20070904 > /usr/bin/gprof is needed by openpkg-import-0-20070904 > /usr/bin/ld is needed by openpkg-import-0-20070904 > /usr/bin/nm is needed by openpkg-import-0-20070904 > /usr/bin/objcopy is needed by openpkg-import-0-20070904 > /usr/bin/objdump is needed by openpkg-import-0-20070904 > /usr/bin/ranlib is needed by openpkg-import-0-20070904 > /usr/bin/readelf is needed by openpkg-import-0-20070904 > /usr/bin/size is needed by openpkg-import-0-20070904 > /usr/bin/strings is needed by openpkg-import-0-20070904 >
These are all executable dependencies (although I cannot tell where they are coming from). Installing binutils will supply all those paths. Why binutils is not automagically included is a different question ... (aside) Hmmm -Ua is no meaningful RPM option (although likely is accepted w/o any error message). What did you intend with "-Ua"? 73 de Jeff ______________________________________________________________________ OpenPKG http://openpkg.org User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org