Nils Larsch
Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:25:16 -0700
Valient Gough wrote:
My previous mail doesn't seem to have appeared on the list, so sending again:Hello,As the maintainer of a package which uses OpenSSL, I've received some reports of 0.9.8e failing to decrypt data which was encrypted by previous versions ofOpenSSL.Attached is a small bit of C++ code which demonstrates the problem. It usesthe EVP interface with EVP_bf_cfb as the cipher and a 256 bit key (the reports all point to Blowfish with key length > 128 bits). What it does is set a key, an IV, and run an encryption pass, then a decryption and compute checksums of the three arrays (original, encrypted, decrypted). When built against 0.9.8c, I get: ort:tmp> g++ -Wall -g -o ssltest ssltest.cpp -lssl -lcrypto -lz ort:tmp> ./ssltest src chksum = 698614540 stage2 chksum = 2266501868 final chksum = 698614540 Another machine with 0.9.7a gives an identical result. On a machine I upgraded to 0.9.8e, I get the following output: src chksum = 698614540 stage2 chksum = 2108297998 final chksum = 698614540"stage2" is the encrypted data, and it differs on 0.9.8e. What this means inpractice is that the program I'm using can encrypt/decrypt data just finewhen run in either version of OpenSSL, but if data is encrypted in an earlierversion and then OpenSSL is upgraded to 0.9.8e, then decryption fails. The nearest I've narrowed down is to something changing between 0.9.8c and 0.9.8e, but I've received reports that 0.9.8d -> 0.9.8e also fails. I've been looking at the diffs between 0.9.8d -> 0.9.8e, but I'm not seeing any obvious problem. Reports are that only Blowfish with key > 128 bits has a problem, and AES users are not affected. Any ideas what's wrong, and if there's a way to get 0.9.8e output to match earlier versions?
it's a bug in openssl 0.9.8e (see [1]). Nils [1] http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=15978 ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]