David C. Hindley
Sun, 23 Jun 2002 07:46:07 -0700
Ian H says: >>The conversation was about the limit of the sea level based on the location of Ein Feshka during the Qumran period. I can't see how hypothetical crevices, passes, caves, etc., have any bearing on the local topography so as to render irrelevant the altitude of Ein Feshka as a limiting factor for the height of the sea at the time. Perhaps you could explain.<<
I think you missed Rochelle's point. It seemed quite clear to me that she was suggesting that earthquake activity, even slight, could change the physical features in the mountain range above the Dead Sea, thus affecting the amount of runoff water to flow into it. I took this to mean that a change that diverted more water into the lake than had been the case beforehand could raise the water level significantly. "Significant" is as little as a few feet. A change of just 1 foot can, depending on the slope of the terrain, move a coastline many many times that difference in feet. On the other hand, wasn't the facility at Ein Feshka built to take advantage of a mineral spring? If so, its location may have nothing to do with coastline location at the time it was built. How far from the current shore *are* the Qumran and Ein Feshka facilities, and what are the relative slopes of the terrain between these facilities and the current shoreline? I recall seeing photos on the net that were accompanied by commentary that suggested that significant changes in the lake's shape had occurred, in both directions. Respectfully, Dave Hindley Cleveland, Ohio, USA For private reply, e-mail to "David C. Hindley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from Orion, e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: "unsubscribe Orion." Archives are on the Orion Web site, http://orion.mscc.huji.ac.il. (PLEASE REMOVE THIS TRAILOR BEFORE REPLYING TO THE MESSAGE)