Muslims lying? Thats a dog bites man story. The stupidity of the Park Service is beyond belief.
B http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/09/muslim-consultants-l ied-to-park-service-about-flight-911-islamic-crescent-memorial.html September 06, 2011 Muslim Consultants Lied to Park Service About Flight 911 Islamic Crescent Memorial Let the record show that there were patriots and freedom lovers who opposed and fought for years against an Islamic crescent pointing towards Mecca as a "memorial" to the American heroes who brought down the last plane taken over by islamic terrorists. We know what it is. Those brave souls on Flight 93 saved the Capitol. Clearly, an Islamic crescent memorial is a seditious insult to their heroic memory. Atlas has been very vocal against this insult for years, <http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/honorflight93/> Crescent-petitionborderedand many have been fighting this battle for quite some time. The leaders of the opposition, Tom Burnett Sr. (whose son Tom was one of those warriors who wrestled the plane away from the allahu akbar-screaming Muslims) and Alec Rawls, are on the vanguard of the fight. The bottom line is, why a crescent? Why not a flag? Or a monument to the group who managed to wrest control of the aircraft away from the Muslim terrrists? A crescent pointing to Mecca? As if that weren't bad enough, the dhimmi Park Service asked Muslim consultants and Islamic scholars for an honest consult? They can't be that clueless; they must be complicit. Shocka, the Muslims lied. Hey, they're supposed to. It is <http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/011-taqiyya.htm> taqiyya, it's in the koran -- lie to advance Islam. Muslim consultants LIED to Park Service <http://errortheory.blogspot.com/2011/09/muslim-consultants-lied-to-park-ser vice.html> Error Theory The Park Service enlisted three outside consultants to assess whether the Crescent of Embrace memorial to Flight 93 really can be seen as a giant mihrab: the Mecca-direction indicator around which every mosque is built. All three consultants, including two Islamic scholars, were blatantly and provably dishonest. Consultant #1 (details below) confirmed to the Park Service that the giant crescent (now called a broken circle) does indeed point almost exactly at Mecca, then when asked about it by the press, denied that there is any such thing as the direction to Mecca (insisting that "you can face any direction to face Mecca"). Consultant #2, a professor of Islamic architecture at MIT, lied about one of the most familiar of all Islamic doctrines, claiming that a legitimate mihrab must point exactly at Mecca. (The original Crescent of Embrace pointed less than 2° north of Mecca. The broken-circle "redesign" points less than 3° south of Mecca. Both highly accurate by Islamic standards.) Consultant #3, a professor of sharia law at Indiana University (!), came up with an almost comically dishonest rationale for dismissing concern about the giant Mecca-oriented crescent: don't worry, no one has ever seen a mihrab anywhere near this BIG before. Not so funny is the Park Service's eagerness to embrace such a transparently ludicrous excuse. The details are documented in a large advertisement <http://www.crescentofbetrayal.com/MuslimConsultsLIED_8-30-11.pdf> that Alec Rawls and Tom Burnett Sr. are running this week in Somerset Pennsylvania as President Obama and the national press arrive in town for the 10th anniversary of 9/11. The press has so far been unwilling to check even the most basic facts about the memorial, like whether the giant crescent really does point to Mecca (takes about 2 minutes <http://www.crescentofbetrayal.com/VerifyingMeccaOrientation.htm> ). Maybe charges that the Park Service and its consultants are telling easily verifiable lies will be more up their alley. That's the hope, but a strong push might also make the difference. If you want to help, here are email addresses for the new Park Superintendent Keith Newlin and for a few Pennsylvania newspapers. You can write your own letter, or just copy the first four paragraphs above, and tell them that you want these charges checked! keith_new...@nps.gov, a...@rawls.org, swischnow...@phillynews.com, ch...@phillynews.com, ajo...@tribdem.com, cminem...@tribdem.com, n...@dailyamerican.com, skal...@post-gazette.com, tbirds...@post-gazette.com, mcoll...@sfchronicle.com, newsd...@kpix.com Ad copy, with links do documentation <http://errortheory.blogspot.com/2011/09/muslim-consultants-lied-to-park-ser vice.html> After a brief primer on the giant Islamic crescent-and-star flag <http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z36/AlecRawls/Central%20crescent/MockUpa ndCrescentBorderedWithCaptio.jpg> that the Park Service is building on the Flight 93 crash site, the ad exposes the three blatantly dishonest consultants that the Park Service invited to please pull the wool over their eyes: Academic charlatan calculates the direction to Mecca, then tells the press that there is no such thing as the direction to Mecca Here's a novel way to deny that the giant crescent points to Mecca. Just deny that there is any such thing as the direction to Mecca. This from the Park Service's first consultant, as reported by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette <http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07230/810465-85.stm> : Daniel Griffith, a geospatial information sciences professor at the University of Texas at Dallas, said anything can point toward Mecca, because the earth is round. That is not an errant paraphrase. Griffith said the same thing to Tribune Democrat reporter Kirk Swauger <http://errortheory.blogspot.com/2007/09/no-direction-to-mecca.html> : He said you can face anywhere to face Mecca. So when Muslims face Mecca for prayer, they are just deluding themselves? They could actually face any old direction and still be facing Mecca? Is there really no such thing as a direction on planet earth? Griffith was lying of course, and the Park Service knew it, because the first thing Griffith's report <http://www.crescentofbetrayal.com/GriffithTribuneReview.htm> on the orientation of the Crescent of Embrace does is calculate the direction from Shanksville to Mecca: I computed an azimuth value from the Flight 93 crater site to Mecca of roughly 55.20°. "Azimuth" means direction, in degrees clockwise from north. Muslims calculate the direction to Mecca by the "great circle" or "shortest distance" method ("as the crow flies," curving only in the over-the-horizon direction), and this is the method Griffith used. He also accepted that the Crescent in the original design drawings points a mere .62° away from Mecca (about a degree closer than it actually points, but no matter). In short, Griffith confirmed the Mecca-orientation of the giant crescent, then denied it to the public, but the Park Service knew the truth, because they had Griffith's actual report. Thus when the Park Service repeated Griffith's denials that the giant crescent points to Mecca, they too were knowingly hiding the truth from the public. One example is the previous Park Superintendent Joanne Hanley. Asked directly whether the giant crescent points to Mecca she denied it, telling <http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07230/810465-85.stm> the Post Gazette that: The only thing that orients the memorial is the crash site. The Mecca-orientation of the giant crescent is clear evidence of an enemy plot to re-hijack Flight 93. The American people need to know the facts, while these public figures have worked desperately to keep the facts from them. Muslim consultant from MIT lied about one of the most familiar of all Islamic doctrines, claiming Mecca-orientation must be exact After Griffith verified that the crescent/broken-circle does indeed point almost exactly at Mecca, the Park Service asked two Islamic scholars whether there was any Islamic significance to this giant Mecca-oriented crescent. Could it by any chance be seen as a giant mihrab? After all, the archetypical mihrab <http://www.islamicgoodsdirect.co.uk/popup_image.php/pID/2230/osCsid/4c7dd2c e873f3124d66ca39791f9ce89> IS crescent shaped <http://looklex.com/spain/cordoba04.htm> . The Park Service's second consultant, a professor of Islamic and mosque architecture at M.I.T. named Nasser Rabbat <http://web.mit.edu/4.614/www/nasserbio/titlepagenr.html> , assured the Park Service <http://www.crescentofbetrayal.com/WhitePaper.htm> that because the crescent does not point exactly at Mecca it cannot be seen as a mihrab: Mihrab orientation is either correct or not. It cannot be off by some degrees. That is a bald lie, and every practicing Muslim knows it. For most of Islam's 1400 year history far-flung Muslims had no accurate way to determine the direction to Mecca. Thus it developed as a matter of religious principle that what matters is intent to face Mecca, with no requirement for precision in actually facing Mecca. Two or three degrees off is highly precise by Islamic standards. Many of the world's most famous mihrabs face 20, 30, 40 or more degrees away from Mecca and it matters not one whit. Every practicing Muslim knows that they only need to face very roughly towards Mecca for prayer because they are constantly availing themselves of this allowance when, five times a day, they seek out walls that they can pray towards that will leave them facing roughly towards Mecca. Not having to face exactly at Mecca for prayer is one of the most familiar of all Islamic doctrines. Saudi religious authorities confirm: mihrab orientation does NOT have to be exact There's more ....much more here. <http://errortheory.blogspot.com/2011/09/muslim-consultants-lied-to-park-ser vice.html> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com. -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor biso...@intellnet.org http://www.intellnet.org Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com Subscribe: osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com Unsubscribe: osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
