Darren thanks for your detailed replies

how do you like the MPP21 ?
and also the oven you mention

what about lead-free, are you going there?
will the oven handle it ?
what about all of our irons? will they need to be replaced?

there are paste dispensers that eliminate the need for a stencil

X/Y motion tables with a time/pressure dot dispenser moving about

$10-20K i think USD

but i have read that better than time/pressure (for releasing a precise amount of paste less dependent on temperature, humidity and paste formulation)
is a type of a screw feeder right above the needle

also have you seen or ever used those tiny 'standard' stencils that have just one chip on them ? (intended for rework)

have you seen
http://www.stencilsunlimited.com/
i haven't tried them

ds

_______________________________________________________________________
Integrated Controls, Inc.           Tel: 415-647-0480  EXT 107
2851 21st Street                    Fax: 415-647-3003
San Francisco, CA 94110             www.integratedcontrolsinc.com


Darren wrote:
Hi Dennis,


i get paste stencils for about $320 USD, so that seems in line w/ what you are all saying


Yep.


they usually take about 1 day turn since i am near silicon valley
actually my assembler gets them but i pay for them


I haven't been able to get them in less then about 3 days, most
suppliers are interstate, and a few are coming from china now.
the trouble is they sure prove to be a disincentive to what i feel to be the worthy goal of 'continuous improvement'

if we build 100 pcs of board before a rev spin we are doing well so i guess $3.20 a board for a stencil is not too bad but when we do 5 different protos and then spin all the revs to the inevitable rev 'B' it sure adds up to a lot of trashed stencils and money

seems like there ought to be a better way


Agree, I have been thinking about it for a while. Inkjet style
device is what is needed.


the only thing i have come up with is putting 2-4 different boards on a 15" x 15" with about 1" between, this can save a bunch, especially on protos


Yes, I do the same often.


camtastic (2000!) makes it pretty easy

darren, not sure what you mean it 'takes a while to burn that w/ manual paste placement'


As in the labour cost to paste the boards, V the cost of the
stencil, which still takes a lot of time to paste a few boards
and then clean up.


are you saying you can do a lot of bds for $320 ?
yes, maybe 2- 5 bds depending on the features


Well it still take time to setup the stencil, screen the
boards and clean up. Then what do you do with the old stencils ..


what do you use ?


I have one of these

        http://www.apsgold.com/p_place.html

The MPP21.

and for an oven..

        http://www.apsgold.com/reflow.htm


a manual time/pressure dot dispenser like EFD?
i have one of those and it is gathering dust now (actually we sometimes use it for gluing things but not bd parts)


I run it on full manual, much faster then setting the time for
each size pad. You get very fast at it.
for protos i gave up on that and just hand solder with the good old metcal and a big jug of flux with a teensy needle tip on the end, it does a better job i think - no solder balls


I use a metcal style iron, hakko in fact to do the fine pitch
stuff, too much trouble to paste, place reflow and then rework the fine pitch. Paste placement is just not controlled well enough.
either way both methods take a LONG time to build one or three boards


Yes, it is very time consuming.


i realize that w/ QFNs and BGAs a stencil is a must so i use those only if they are a must do


I haven't done much BGA stuff in house yet, but I will have to address that soon.
in fact after switching over to 0603s i am now switching back to 0805s due to low volumes and the greater ease of troubleshooting and mods


0603 can be small, but after doing some 0402 stuff, they don't
seem so bad. I remember 20 years back when 1206 seemed to be
small. :|


back to SIPAD...
it appears that somewhere along the process, unless i have been misinformed, they make a stencil and do what the assembler would do just at a different point in time still, it does allow storage and therefore time shifting of that process


To me I can't see much gain.

Regards,
Darren Moore



ds



____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the OT discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/ot_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to