owlim-discussion  

Re: [Owlim-discussion] Is it possible to run SwiftOWLIM without inference?

Ivan Peikov
Thu, 22 Jul 2010 04:38:54 -0700

Hi Chris,

The issue you reported (re-infering process occurring even with "empty" 
ruleset) is indeed a bug inside SwiftOWLIM 3.0.12.

This issue has been fixed in the upcoming release of SwiftOWLIM which is to be 
announced probably today. Hope you won't be experiencing this problem with it.


Cheers,
Ivan

On Wednesday 21 July 2010 23:11:49 Chris Halaschek wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We're having a problem getting SwiftOWLIM to run with no rules.
> Effectively, we're trying to set it up just as a straight RDF triple
> store with no reasoning at all.
> 
> We initially tried setting the ruleset in the config file to 'empty',
> as indicated in the user docs.  However, when we delete a single
> rdfs:label triple in a repository with ~1mm triples, it takes 10s of
> seconds to perform this trivial deletion, which leads me to believe
> that SwiftOWLIM is trying to re-derive inferences, which there are
> none.
> 
> We secondly tried creating a new rules file with simple empty
> Prefices, Axioms, and Rules blocks, but then we get compilation errors
> when it tries to load the rules files.
> 
> Can you offer any suggestion?
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris
> 
_______________________________________________
OWLIM-discussion mailing list
OWLIM-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion