Chris Halaschek
Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:16:42 -0700
Thanks Ivan. I look forward to the new release. Best, Chris
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Ivan Peikov <ivan.pei...@ontotext.com> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > The issue you reported (re-infering process occurring even with "empty" > ruleset) is indeed a bug inside SwiftOWLIM 3.0.12. > > This issue has been fixed in the upcoming release of SwiftOWLIM which is to be > announced probably today. Hope you won't be experiencing this problem with it. > > > Cheers, > Ivan > > On Wednesday 21 July 2010 23:11:49 Chris Halaschek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We're having a problem getting SwiftOWLIM to run with no rules. >> Effectively, we're trying to set it up just as a straight RDF triple >> store with no reasoning at all. >> >> We initially tried setting the ruleset in the config file to 'empty', >> as indicated in the user docs. However, when we delete a single >> rdfs:label triple in a repository with ~1mm triples, it takes 10s of >> seconds to perform this trivial deletion, which leads me to believe >> that SwiftOWLIM is trying to re-derive inferences, which there are >> none. >> >> We secondly tried creating a new rules file with simple empty >> Prefices, Axioms, and Rules blocks, but then we get compilation errors >> when it tries to load the rules files. >> >> Can you offer any suggestion? >> >> Thanks, >> Chris >> > -- Christian Halaschek-Wiener, Ph.D. http://www.mindswap.org/~chris chalasc...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ OWLIM-discussion mailing list OWLIM-discussion@ontotext.com http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion