Well given the outstanding review given here: http://tinyurl.com/zhprgcx, I would say that unless you want to blow up your pics to wall size, this lens will fulfill most requirements (28-105) and is a heck of a lot more affordable.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Gonz <rgonzoma...@gmail.com> wrote: > No, I'm in the Austin, Tx area. > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote: >> >> >> Gonz wrote: >>> >>> Anybody have both of these lenses and compared them? The 24-70 is >>> almost 3x the price of the 28-105 and besides the constant 2.8 >>> aperture, is the image quality that much better? >> >> >> Aren't you in the bay area? You're welcome to come over and try mine for >> yourself sometime. >> >> >>> >> >> -- >> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > > -- > -- Reduce your Government Footprint -- -- Reduce your Government Footprint -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
