> On 22 February 2017 at 21:14 Bill <anotherdrunken...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 2/22/2017 1:24 AM, mike wilson wrote: > >> On 21 February 2017 at 21:52 Bill <anotherdrunken...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 2/21/2017 3:10 PM, Brian Walters wrote: > >>> I just found this article. > >>> > >>> A bit of nostalgia for the LX cognoscenti.... > >>> > >>> https://www.casualphotophile.com/2017/02/19/pentax-lx-camera-review-the-best-professional-35mm-slr-around/ > >> > >> Nice. > >> I'm in the process of moving from a storage lock-up that I've had since > >> around the time I did the big home reno in 2003. Going through boxes of > >> various stuff I found 3 (yes 3) LX bodies, all serviced in 2002 qnd then > >> put away, the full selection of viewfinders, A Winder LX, what seems > >> like an endless variety of filters, just an amazing treasure trove of > >> what has become very pretty, but useless junk (kind of like my first > >> girlfriend, who was also useless but very pretty). > > > > Beg to differ. It pretty much does what it always did, given allowance for > > the > > vagaries of time, plus it has bonus qualities. As an example of how it > > improves > > over your first girlfriend, I'll ask how much you want for the AF-1W and > > I'll > > check to see which screens I am missing from my set. I bet you didn't get > > any > > financial return from your other candidate in the useless stakes. > > > > Sadly, no FA-1W finder. It's about the only one I don't have.
Any other interesting system bits? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
