The HD DFA645 28-45 is a ridiculously good landscape lens, it runs rings around the 15-30/2.8 Tamron for edge to edge sharpness, flare resistance and lack of CA.
On 22 May 2017 at 08:05, Bruce Walker <bruce.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Zos Xavius <zosxav...@gmail.com> wrote: >> someone leaked the test results for the 645z from dxomark (yes they >> tested it) and it came to 100 if I remember correctly. a lot of people >> think there is a conspiracy, but who knows? >> >> that said the K-1 is the better choice in many ways unless you are >> looking to spend thousands on lenses. The newer zooms are definitely >> not cheap on the 645Z. Neither is the 90mm and such. >> >> With pixel shift the results are pretty close between the two. Close >> enough to offset the massive difference in cost. Unless medium format >> is totally your thing, then I could understand. I keep thinking about >> a used 645D myself. > > I agree that pixel-shift might pretty-much close the gap between the > two bodies for landscape, but it is completely useless for many > styles/subjects of shooting. Like any kind of people or sports. Any > handheld use. In fact anything at all where the subject or camera > might move. :) > > And then there's the issue of processing pixel-shifted results. All I > hear lately is folks perplexed about how you post-process > pixel-shifted files. To me all this makes pixel shift a novelty > feature. > > -- > -bmw > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
