raghu
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:19:56 -0700
First there was Kartik Athreya: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ambroseevans-pritchard/100006729/time-to-shut-down-the-us-federal-reserve/
Now, here is Narayana Kocherlakota. I have no idea how to make sense of the following excerpt from a speech by this guy who is now the President of the Minneapolis Fed (and soon to be FOMC member??). http://www.minneapolisfed.org/news_events/pres/speech_display.cfm?id=4525 ------------------------------------------------snip Long-run monetary neutrality is an uncontroversial, simple, but nonetheless profound proposition. In particular, it implies that if the FOMC maintains the fed funds rate at its current level of 0-25 basis points for too long, both anticipated and actual inflation have to become negative. Why? It’s simple arithmetic. Let’s say that the real rate of return on safe investments is 1 percent and we need to add an amount of anticipated inflation that will result in a fed funds rate of 0.25 percent. The only way to get that is to add a negative number—in this case, –0.75 percent. To sum up, over the long run, a low fed funds rate must lead to consistent—but low—levels of deflation. -raghu. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list pen-l@lists.csuchico.edu https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l