perl-qa  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Gabor Szabo
  • RE: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Gergely Brautigam
  • RE: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Gergely Brautigam
  • Why use Perl for testing? (was Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist) Andy Armstrong
  • RE: Why use Perl for testing? (was Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist) Gergely Brautigam
  • Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Gabor Szabo
  • RE: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Gergely Brautigam
  • Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Andy Armstrong
  • RE: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Gergely Brautigam
  • Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Andy Armstrong
  • RE: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Gergely Brautigam
  • Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Andy Armstrong
  • RE: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Gergely Brautigam
  • Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Gabor Szabo
  • Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Michael G Schwern
  • RE: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Gergely Brautigam
  • Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Gabor Szabo
  • Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Nicholas Clark
  • Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Gabor Szabo
  • Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Ovid
  • Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Gabor Szabo
  • RE: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Gergely Brautigam
  • Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Gabor Szabo
  • RE: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Gergely Brautigam
  • Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist Salve J Nilsen
  • Re: My Perl QA Hackathon Wishlist James E Keenan
• [Slightly OT] Interpreting cpan-testers failures Michael Carman
  • Re: [Slightly OT] Interpreting cpan-testers failures Shawn Boyette ☠
  • Re: [Slightly OT] Interpreting cpan-testers failures David Golden
  • Re: [Slightly OT] Interpreting cpan-testers failures Andreas J. Koenig
  • Re: [Slightly OT] Interpreting cpan-testers failures Michael Carman
• Patent for "Software Package Verification" nothing to worry about Michael G Schwern
• Getting the bare ok count Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
  • Re: Getting the bare ok count Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Getting the bare ok count Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
  • Re: Getting the bare ok count Michael Peters
  • Re: Getting the bare ok count Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
  • Re: Getting the bare ok count Michael Peters
• Test::Aggregate 0.11 Ovid
• Module-Faker and CPAN-Faker (RIP EU::FakeMaker) Ricardo SIGNES
• Why should package declaration match filename? Matisse Enzer
  • Re: Why should package declaration match filename? Eric Wilhelm
  • Re: Why should package declaration match filename? Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
  • Re: Why should package declaration match filename? Michael G Schwern
  • Re: Why should package declaration match filename? Matisse Enzer
  • Re: Why should package declaration match filename? Dave Rolsky
  • Re: Why should package declaration match filename? Michael G Schwern
  • Re: Why should package declaration match filename? David Cantrell
  • Re: Why should package declaration match filename? Matisse Enzer
  • Re: Why should package declaration match filename? Eric Wilhelm
  • Re: Why should package declaration match filename? Matisse Enzer
  • Re: Why should package declaration match filename? David Cantrell
  • Re: Why should package declaration match filename? Michael G Schwern
• ExtUtils::FakeMaker 0.001 uploaded Ricardo SIGNES
  • Re: ExtUtils::FakeMaker 0.001 uploaded Michael G Schwern
• New Devel::CheckOS and Devel::CheckLib David Cantrell
• Re: [tap-l] SKIP_ALL tests should not get hidden Michael G Schwern
• Perl Testing and QA at YAPC::NA::2008 in Chicago, June 16-18 James E Keenan
• Test::Aggregate 0.08 Ovid
• A thank you to all CPAN testers. Elliot Shank
• TAP::Harness / CPAN problem Chris Dolan
  • Re: TAP::Harness / CPAN problem Andy Armstrong
  • Re: TAP::Harness / CPAN problem Chris Dolan
  • Re: TAP::Harness / CPAN problem Andy Armstrong
  • Re: TAP::Harness / CPAN problem Michael G Schwern
• Detailed name of the Operating System in the CPAN Tester reports Gabor Szabo
  • Re: Detailed name of the Operating System in the CPAN Tester reports David Cantrell
  • Re: Detailed name of the Operating System in the CPAN Tester reports David Golden
• POD doesn't capture code semantics Andy Armstrong
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics Ian Malpass
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics Andy Armstrong
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics Ian Malpass
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics Andy Armstrong
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics David Golden
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics Andy Armstrong
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics chromatic
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics Andy Armstrong
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics David Cantrell
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics Andy Armstrong
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics Ovid
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics David Golden
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics Andy Armstrong
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics Adriano Ferreira
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics Andy Armstrong
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics Adriano Ferreira
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics Andy Armstrong
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics Andy Armstrong
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics Adriano Ferreira
  • Re: POD doesn't capture code semantics Steffen Schwigon
• IEEE Testing Conference in Lillehammer Michael G Schwern
• Test-Simple 0.77 fixage Michael G Schwern
  • Re: Test-Simple 0.77 fixage chromatic
  • Re: Test-Simple 0.77 fixage Michael G Schwern
• CPANTesters considered harmful demerphq
  • Re: CPANTesters considered harmful Andy Armstrong
  • Re: CPANTesters considered harmful Andy Armstrong
  • Re: CPANTesters considered harmful David Golden
  • Re: CPANTesters considered harmful demerphq
  • Re: CPANTesters considered harmful Andy Armstrong
  • Re: CPANTesters considered harmful demerphq
  • Re: CPANTesters considered harmful demerphq
  • Re: CPANTesters considered harmful David Golden
  • Re: CPANTesters considered harmful Smylers
  • Re: CPANTesters considered harmful Nicholas Clark
  • Re: CPANTesters considered harmful Michael G Schwern
  • Re: CPANTesters considered harmful Brad Oaks
  • Re: CPANTesters considered harmful Smylers
  • Re: CPANTesters considered harmful Nicholas Clark
  • More information in NAs (was Re: CPANTesters considered harmful) Michael G Schwern
  • Re: More information in NAs (was Re: CPANTesters considered harmful) David Golden
  • Re: More information in NAs (was Re: CPANTesters considered harmful) Michael G Schwern
  • Re: More information in NAs (was Re: CPANTesters considered harmful) David Golden
  • Re: More information in NAs (was Re: CPANTesters considered harmful) Michael G Schwern
• summer of perl - project ideas, and mentors wanted Eric Wilhelm
• Odd Test::Warn 'carped warning' results Greg Sabino Mullane
• QA Hackathon - Where are you staying? Gabor Szabo
• Debugger: stopping in caller Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Debugger: stopping in caller Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Debugger: stopping in caller Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Debugger: stopping in caller Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Debugger: stopping in caller Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Debugger: stopping in caller Andy Armstrong
  • .perldb (Was: Re: Debugger: stopping in caller) Smylers
  • Re: .perldb (Was: Re: Debugger: stopping in caller) Andy Armstrong
• Re: Providing command-line arguments to tests run via 'prove' James E Keenan
  • Re: Providing command-line arguments to tests run via 'prove' Andy Armstrong
• Test::Class usage Cosimo Streppone
  • Re: Test::Class usage Adrian Howard
  • Re: Test::Class usage Cosimo Streppone
• Is there even a C compiler? Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? Nicholas Clark
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? David Cantrell
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? David Cantrell
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? David Cantrell
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? David Golden
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? Eric Wilhelm
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? David Golden
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? Eric Wilhelm
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? chromatic
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? David Golden
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? chromatic
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? Eric Wilhelm
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? David Golden
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? Michael G Schwern
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Is there even a C compiler? Michael G Schwern
• author tests with Module::Install::AuthorTests Ricardo SIGNES
  • Re: author tests with Module::Install::AuthorTests Eric Wilhelm
  • Re: author tests with Module::Install::AuthorTests Ricardo SIGNES
• Wide character support for Test::More Michael G Schwern
  • Re: Wide character support for Test::More Aristotle Pagaltzis
  • Re: Wide character support for Test::More Michael G Schwern
  • Re: Wide character support for Test::More David E. Wheeler
  • Re: Wide character support for Test::More Aristotle Pagaltzis
  • Re: Wide character support for Test::More Nicholas Clark
  • Re: Wide character support for Test::More Aristotle Pagaltzis
• CPANTS Site Seems... Confused Randy J. Ray
  • Re: CPANTS Site Seems... Confused David Golden
  • Re: CPANTS Site Seems... Confused Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni
  • Re: CPANTS Site Seems... Confused Randy J. Ray
  • Re: CPANTS Site Seems... Confused Thomas Klausner
  • Re: CPANTS Site Seems... Confused Thomas Klausner
  • Re: CPANTS Site Seems... Confused Randy J. Ray
  • Re: CPANTS Site Seems... Confused Aristotle Pagaltzis
  • Re: CPANTS Site Seems... Confused Thomas Klausner
  • Re: CPANTS Site Seems... Confused James E Keenan
• Re: Change 33313 causing failures Nicholas Clark
  • Re: Change 33313 causing failures Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Change 33313 causing failures Rafael Garcia-Suarez
  • Re: Change 33313 causing failures Andy Armstrong
  • Re: Change 33313 causing failures Andy Armstrong
• Re: Diagnostics David Landgren
  • Re: Diagnostics chromatic
  • Re: Diagnostics Michael G Schwern
  • Re: Diagnostics Ovid
  • Re: Diagnostics Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
  • Re: Diagnostics Matisse Enzer
  • Smoking private dists? was Re: Diagnostics was Re: Smoking private dists? Paul Johnson
  • Re: Smoking private dists? was Re: Diagnostics was Re: Smoking private dists? Michael Peters
  • Re: Diagnostics Chris Dolan
• New assertions in Ruby Andy Lester
  • Re: New assertions in Ruby Adrian Howard
  • Re: New assertions in Ruby Eric Wilhelm
  • Re: New assertions in Ruby chromatic
  • Re: New assertions in Ruby Yuval Kogman
  • Re: New assertions in Ruby chromatic
  • Re: New assertions in Ruby Michael G Schwern
  • Re: New assertions in Ruby Adrian Howard
  • Re: New assertions in Ruby Michael G Schwern
  • Re: New assertions in Ruby Yuval Kogman
• ignoring already installed modules during a cpan install Andrew Hampe
  • Re: ignoring already installed modules during a cpan install chromatic
  • Re: ignoring already installed modules during a cpan install David Golden

• Earlier messages
• Later messages