Edward Peschko
Fri, 09 Feb 2001 17:22:24 -0800
> Eric Raymond's book-in-development ``The Art of Unix Programming'' says > this about the future of Perl: >> Perl usage has grown respectably, but the language itself has been stagnant >> for two years or more. > Bah. Looks like my Perl5-Porters summaries have been completely in vain. :) yeah, he's full of BS here.. > Perl's internals are notoriously grubby; it's been understood for years that > the language's implementation needs to be rewritten from scratch, but an > attempt in 1999 failed and another seems presently stalled. > If that other is Perl 6, I don't think we're stalled, are we? Language design > is waiting on Larry to produce the spec, and internals design is going on > quietly but steadily. We're in the design stage. That'll probably last a while > because scripting languages and interpreters aren't easy things to design, and > are even harder to get right. yeah well, sometimes I think that things *are* stalled. For example, I'm trying to both update my last book (and perhaps write a new one) and its kind of difficult to start let alone convince an editor to put the effort in if you don't even have a spec to work from. And lacking a spec, a status would be nice. Last time I heard, larry was going to be working on 'chunks of RFCs at a time' and posting the results of those for digestion. What happened to that? The last thing posted was Dec 20th on the subject. Is there a place for statuses that I'm unaware of? Ed