Re: State of PDD 0

[Dan Sugalski]

At 09:05 AM 2/20/2001 -0500, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
>To date, I've received a whopping zero comments on PDD 0, the defining
>document for the PDD process.
>
>That means one of five things:
>http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01126.html
>
>Nat, Dan: PDD 0 is also still at the Proposed level (even though it was
>assigned a number).  Is it at least good enough to bump to Developing?

D'oh! Yes, mark it as Approved, or whichever step is past developing. (I'm 
a little scattered at the moment, so I don't have the doc handy)


                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk