Re: State of PDD 0

[Bryan C . Warnock]

On Tuesday 20 February 2001 11:22, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> D'oh! Yes, mark it as Approved, or whichever step is past developing. 
(I'm 
> a little scattered at the moment, so I don't have the doc handy)

Actually, now that I've been updating this, I'm going to hold it at 
development for a little while, if only because I have some more changes 
coming down the pike.  (The actual formatting will stay the same, so I 
guess Simon would call these meta-meta-meta changes.)

Ask, all, are we reusing perl6-rfc as the submittal address, or will there 
be a new one (perl-pdd)? 

-- 
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]