Re: State of PDD 0

[Adam Turoff]

On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 05:42:01PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 02:38 PM 2/20/2001 -0800, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> >How should the submission process work? As for the RFC's?
> 
> Sounds good to me.

Any additional constraints on acceptance criteria?  PDD 0 describes
an acceptable baseline on rejection (return incomplete submissions),
but I daresay that we want something more strict.  

For example, I doubt that we want or need three competing PDDs on
Async I/O developing in the Standard track, but multiple PDDs on
the same topic would be welcome if they were Experimental (or even
Informational).

Would any other constraints help to promote discussion moving forward?
The goal isn't to be burdensome on people actually volunteering their
time, but to cut down on the crosstalk that doesn't lead to Real Work(tm).

Z.