Bryan C . Warnock
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:24:48 -0800
On Tuesday 20 February 2001 17:30, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 02:15 PM 2/20/2001 -0700, Nathan Torkington wrote: > >Bryan C. Warnock writes: > > > Ask, all, are we reusing perl6-rfc as the submittal address, or will there > > > be a new one (perl-pdd)? > > > >I'm in favour of renaming to reflect the new use of the list. Dan? > > I've been thinking since I sent my last mail on this that we might actually > want to leave the two (PDD & RFC) separate. Keep on with the RFCs for > 'external' things, and PDD for the actual internals implementation of things. I'm not particularly fond of an internal/external delineation, but I'm not adverse to RFCs being generated as they were before - to initiate discussion. If nothing else, it would make the transition to an actual PDD easier. -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]