Larry Wall skribis 2006-09-21 15:24 (-0700):
> : > That is, empty .[] has the same arrayifying semantics as @. (This is
> : > currently b0rken in pugs though.) Likewise .{} is equivalen to %.
> : Nice, but what's the syntax for an empty slice then?
> Oh, I expect .[()] would work for that. Why you'd want one beats me.
Generated code. It's nice that Perl usually isn't picky about such
things, because it saves you a lot of special cases when you're
generating code.
--
korajn salutojn,
juerd waalboer: perl hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://juerd.nl/sig>
convolution: ict solutions and consultancy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
