On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 12 Jun 2017, at 22:04, Will Coleda <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:17 AM, Francesco Rivetti <[email protected]> wrote: >>> if you can: >>> >>> $s ~~ "foo" >>> $s ~~ /foo/ >>> >>> then wouldn't be good to have also: >>> >>> $s.contains("foo"); >>> $s.contains(/foo/); >> >> The latter is currently available as: >> >>> "foobar".match(/'foo'/); >> ｢foo｣ > > That’s not entirely true, as .contains returns a Bool:D, not a Match object. > It *could* be interesting to not have to build the entire Match object > somehow and just return a Bool:D in case of contains. > > > Liz
Sorry, you're right, it's: ?"foobar".match(/'foo'/); -- Will "Coke" Coleda
