On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Saied Nesbat wrote: > This sounds like overkill, a roundabout way of doing that has > to be done a lot simpler. Am I missing something? Since the > Unicode characters have the information, should Word not at > least act as a simple box?
Implementing the whole Unicode in Microsoft way means a lot of code which results in a lot of binaries, so they simply can't install them all 'just in case'. You need to explicitly ask it to install Arabic script support... > Best regards, > > Saied --behdad http://behdad.org/ _______________________________________________ PersianComputing mailing list PersianComputing@lists.sharif.edu http://lists.sharif.edu/mailman/listinfo/persiancomputing
