Hi Christopher, You can interpret the:
> Thanks for your concerns! But I still do not see where the problem is. I > don't > care what others do with the code. It is free! As make a ~fork~ of it which adds license headers you seem to desperately want. 2017-03-13 7:57 GMT+01:00 Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de>: > Hi Christopher, > > > Nevertheless, I would strongly recommend *at least* putting licensing > > information on the JavaScript files, even if only using the one-liner > > approach. Since the JavaScript will usually be served through a Web > > server, it will be impossible for Web users to tell that it is freely > > licensed code. Code with unclear licensing is no better than proprietary > > code for practical purposes. > > Thanks for your concerns! But I still do not see where the problem is. I > don't > care what others do with the code. It is free! > > ♪♫ Alex > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe >
