Patryk Zawadzki
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:16:45 -0700
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Jan Rekorajski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: >> R: upstart-SystemV > Try doing that and gdm will end up in /dev/null. Because? AFAIK upstart is going to be default for Th at some point. upstart-SystemV is built from SystemV sources and is a compatibility mode for apps not using upstart event scripts. >> >> - force Xorg to use a certain tty (there used to be a hack in GDM 2.20 >> >> for this as at this time Xorg did not have vte detection of its own, > No? Really? Damn, that must have been a miracle it worked for me for more > than 10 years... Xorg devs prefer if we let Xorg pick the vte. It worked for you because back then Xorg did not do this and gdm forced vte9. >> Don't ask me, we use a pretty non-standard and not-recommended method >> to start gdm. > What was the problem with forcing a tty number in default config? See above. > It worked for years. And BTW having multiple Xorg instances on one > machine is a very non-standard thing, so why should we care? It's pretty standard for any computer with user switching if you ask me. >> It's a new app written from scratch. A more correct statement would be >> "everything is no more." > As usual with Gnome, total fuck up first, maybe clean up later. A lot later. Please elaborate on that on GNOME lists or /dev/null. > BTW When will you (you as Gnome develpoers) fix session handling (like > save/restore)? When you file a proper bug report. >> Will do. > We'll see, and smite you if you screw this up again. Sure, sure. Either propose a working solution or kiss my tail -1 -- Patryk Zawadzki _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en