Hi Alberto,

You may, sure. Although, if the issue is it dumps 32k routes out of 42k,
it may be something else than a performance issue. It smells it will need
more info in order to reproduce it.

Cheers,
Paolo
 
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:55:54PM +0100, Alberto Santos wrote:
> Thx a lot
> I also notice performance issues when dumping the table.  Today i have 42 k
> mpls vpn v4 routes but it only dumps 32k
> Do u want me to create another issue?
> BR
> Al
> 
> On Dec 2, 2016 18:50, "Paolo Lucente" <pa...@pmacct.net> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hi Alberto,
> >
> > I see you opened an issue on GitHub too about this. To avoid duplications,
> > let me handle this there. I will try to replicate the problem in lab and
> > come back to you. It smells like a bug.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Paolo
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 07:29:14PM +0100, Alberto Santos wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I started playing with pmacct and I noticed that the route distinguisher
> > RD
> > > looks wired when dumping the BGP table in a file. Is there any reason
> > why?
> > >
> > > here it is an example:
> > >
> > > "rd": "1:40.0.17.10:256
> > >
> > > The IP address is inverted, it should be 10.17.0.40 and the 2nd part
> > should
> > > be 1806 instead.
> > > Is this a bug? pls find below the complete output from the file.
> > >
> > > [root@hostname]# cat bgp-10_197_1_114-2016_11_29T20_05_00.txt | grep
> > > 10.12.95.16
> > > {"timestamp": "2016-11-29 20:05:00", "peer_ip_src": "10.17.1.14",
> > > "event_type": "dump", "ip_prefix": "10.12.95.16/28", "bgp_nexthop":
> > > "10.17.1.14", "as_path": "65346", "comms": "65346:39", "ecomms":
> > > "RT:65432:2", "origin": 0, "local_pref": 100, "rd": "1:40.0.17.10:256"}
> > >
> > > BR
> > >
> > > Alberto
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > pmacct-discussion mailing list
> > > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pmacct-discussion mailing list
> > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
> >

_______________________________________________
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

Reply via email to