Thanks for your feedback, much appreciated!
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 07:17:53AM -0500, chip wrote:
> HI Paolo,
> After doing some further digging on our application I found that we're
> already using pmacct to ingest flows and then pushing it into
> elasticsearch. We can utilize the pre-tag-maps there and have no need for
> additional netflow replication. I still think the ability would be of
> great use but I don't want to push for a feature I have no immediate use
> Thanks greatly!
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Paolo Lucente <pa...@pmacct.net> wrote:
> > Hi Chip,
> > Thanks a lot for your feedback on this. It makes sense to port the work
> > done for sFlow on NetFlow v9/IPFIX; i have not planned it yet mainly as
> > i was precisely waiting for gathering interest. Do you think we can
> > continue 1:1 on this thread? I'd be looking for your use-case and, given
> > that, work towards a goal (ie. set of functionalities required, timeline,
> > testing, etc.).
> > Paolo
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:01:56AM -0500, chip wrote:
> > > HI All,
> > >
> > > I love the ability to use pre_tag_map for replicating flows to multiple
> > > receivers and being able to filter on specific interfaces or other items.
> > > I'm just curious if there is already anything in the works or planned
> > > support of doing this with Netflow V9/IPFIX records.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > --chip
> > >
> > > --
> > > Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc....
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > pmacct-discussion mailing list
> > > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
> > _______________________________________________
> > pmacct-discussion mailing list
> > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
> Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc....
pmacct-discussion mailing list